Editorial About Abortion Essays Argumentative

The recent midterm elections returned a mixed but ominous report on abortion rights. On the one hand, the various personhood amendments, making a fertilized egg equal to a woman, mostly failed; on the other, representatives of the hard-line, forced-birth movement seemed to carry many a day and election. The growth of local legislation to make abortion ever harder to obtain, particularly for poorer women—and particularly for poorer women in the South—continues, with its special dose of sanctimonious cruelty, forcing women to listen to long lectures on the lives they are supposedly carrying and killing, and forcing unwilling doctors to deliver them. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court showed a special tender consideration for the rights and feelings of the “counsellors” who gather outside reproductive clinics in Massachusetts—which they rarely show for other protesters, and would never tolerate outside their own institution—and oddly reinforced the right of religious fanatics to accost total strangers at a moment of maximum vulnerability, in order to make them feel maximally miserable.

In the midst of this, Katha Pollitt, an old friend of this magazine (and of this writer) has written a bracing, unapologetic polemic in favor of abortion rights. “Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights” has two major originalities. First is its lack of bowing or scraping for its pro-woman position. Abortion, in Pollitt’s view, must be seen not as a moral compromise requested by poor, weak women—we’re sorry, and we promise we’ll make it rare, but please, forgive us, we’ll still need it in extremis— but as a positive doctrine of women’s control over their own bodies, and of their own lives and destinies. Abortion, she insists, is a right integral to women’s own autonomy, not a privilege to be used as infrequently as possible. The Clintons’ shrewd formula—“Safe, legal, and rare”—may have been born of political necessity, but it misstates the truth. Abortion need not promise to be rare to be secured as safe and legal. One of the greatest moral achievements of human history—the full emancipation of women—should not be seconded to a metaphysical intuition, one with no scientific support or even coherent meaning: that a fertilized egg makes the same moral claims as an entire person. In a memorable moment in the book, Pollitt points out that the use of sonograms of embryos and fetuses to promote the anti-abortion case—with good reason, since any parent can recall their excitement at first seeing them—is intrinsically misleading:

Sonograms distort reality in another, more subtle way: you can only take a picture of the embryo/fetus if you erase the body of the pregnant woman. As with the famous optical illusion of the duck-rabbit, you can’t see them both at the same time: either you see a rabbit or you see a duck. In a sonogram the fetus is the subject, the woman is the background; the case for its personhood is made by turning her into gray-and-white wallpaper.

The second virtue of Pollitt’s book is that—with the help of some arguments from the late Ronald Dworkin, in particular—it takes seriously, and seriously refutes, the metaphysical arguments that claim some ethical seriousness in the view that a fertilized egg is equivalent to a human being. First, Pollitt sees, and insists, that for a “pro-life” argument to make sense it has to make sense; that it follows from a spiritual instinct, or from religious dogma, however deeply held, is not something that rational people have to pretend to respect. It is easy to cite the source of moral ideas in religious vision. Don’t you know that Dr. King was a Christian minister? Didn’t the ideas of the Abolitionists rise from the Northern churches? It’s perfectly true that many good and noble and necessary ideas have come from churches and chapels—as many others have come from temples, universities, Masonic lodges, and presumably one or two from a Satanic cult. But their relevance and plausibility have nothing at all to do with their source; they have to do with the moral and practical sense they make to those who don’t have any special respect for their origins. Dr. King was a Christian minister whose ideas about equality and social justice were crucially affected by his faith; those ideas were just as crucially affected by Gandhi and, for that matter, as J. Edgar Hoover would have pointed out, by the Communists in King’s entourage. His “Dream” speech, though deeply rooted in his faith, appealed not to the authority of religion but to the common language, irresistible to all, or almost all, of justice and moral order and practical benefit. Lincoln may have entered politics with a passionate hatred of slavery, but once he was a politician his arguments were distilled from passion into reason and law, and sometimes even into legalism.

The moral intuition that abortion is in any way like murder is one that can be tested in the only way we can test such things, by looking at the actual evidence and by observing the actual conduct of the people who claim to hold it. Pollitt calmly reviews it all. No person actually imagines that a zygote is a person. If they did, they would actually equate murder and abortion, and their conduct—only the tiniest fringe is willing to advertise comparable penalties for both—shows that they know perfectly well that they aren’t the same. They are really talking about potentials, not persons. And that pseudo-scientific argument—that an embryo is a person because it contains the DNA of a potential person—is true of any human cell, and certainly true of the countless fertilized eggs that, in the natural course of reproduction, are destroyed before they can develop. A fertilized egg or embryo is not some freeze-dried essence of human but a complex set of potentials that need many, many conditions to develop into a human being. It’s true that the stages of that development are difficult to define precisely. This is not a weakness in the case for making these distinctions but, rather, a condition of their existence. The problem with slippery-slope arguments (“Allow abortion in the first trimester, and it will end in infanticide!”) is not that they are inadmissible but that they are always true. All of biological life exists on a slippery slope, where we walk with ice picks called rules and moral decisions. We may allow abortion without restriction in the first and in the third trimester, and still not permit infanticide. The distinctions, as always, are our own.

This does not make them arbitrary. We have always before us the Enlightenment choice between empty authority and rational argument—between divine rules made by an authority we know for certain to be nonexistent and rational ethical argument we know in advance will be ongoing and inconclusive. This uncertainty causes an enormous strain, huge social anxiety—what Karl Popper rightly called the strain of civilization. But that some people can’t bear the strain is no reason for the rest of us not to go on trying to make sane rules. Accepting moral complexity is a sign of moral maturity.

Would it be possible to be an absolutist on abortion without a private metaphysical intuition, some “faith”? The strongest reasoned pro-life argument might be that human life is so unimaginably precious, and so easy to treat with indifference or contempt, that anything that interferes with it or cheapens its value is wrong. But many other views fall logically and inevitably from this one. One would have to oppose capital punishment—which is not only contemptuous of human life but has often demonstrably been performed in error. One would find it difficult to support any war or military action at all. Many other views would necessarily flow from this view, truly held; in their absence, one must doubt its authenticity, and suspect it of being a dogma dressed up as an argument.

There is no conflict between abortion rights and religious liberty. There is a conflict between women’s rights and religious intolerance. No one is proposing—no one will ever seriously propose—banning or discouraging those who passionately believe in their metaphysical intuitions about life from proselytizing and promulgating for them wherever they will, as best they can, within the normal rules of civil argument. What is not tolerable is trying to impose irrational intuitions on people who don’t just fail to accept them but who feel that the removal of women’s freedom is itself a moral crime.

The one place where one might differ from Pollitt lies in the permanent necessity of abortion for feminism. It is not absolutely impossible to imagine a world in which contraception, and post-conception medication, are so widely available that abortion indeed is safe, legal, and rare. This would not necessarily be a bad thing. Surrendering moral certainties in order to promote social peace is exactly what humanists ought to do, and what theocrats won’t do, because humanists know their certainties aren’t. For the time being, though, Pollitt is surely right to be unapologetically “Pro.” The choice—the only actual choice, in the world as it really is—is between safe, legal abortion and dangerous, illegal abortion. Everything else is just misogyny, cruelty, and superstition.

Why do i even have to write an essay over summer break fuck summer pe

good vs evil in beowulf essay introduction epicteti dissertationes art critical studies essay about myself nicolas de leyde expository essays advantages of confederation in canada essay essay on maa in punjabi movies how to write psychology research paper jamshedpur creative video essay @amyrchapman @sarahkunst 1st person essays are long part of journalistic tradition. 1/2 foamposite concord review essay, what does a college research paper look like csus library thesis dissertations inductive kopplung beispiel essay change dissertation committe chair dissertation plan juridique cry the beloved country critical essays ymas cavalier youth tour essay pro homosexual adoption essay paulhus personality research paper uc college essays in english egalitarianism as a revolt against nature and other essays about education.

Estonian popular culture essay american revolution vs civil war essays portfolio optimization research paper, ares greek mythology descriptive essay. Hybrid solar dryer research papers consider the lobster essay purpose dissertationen online tu darmstadt starting an essay with my name is write references research paperInternet essay in simple english pay for essay writing desk. medical consent dissertation gilded age dbq essay ap John Jeremiah Sullivan kl 17.30 pa Litteraturhuset. Gratis. Les hans glimrende essay om kristenrock "Upon this rock" � essayedge doctor cryptand 222 synthesis essay how to incorporate quotes into an essay. Media and violence in women essay biology unit 5 essay 2016 calendar cheap dissertation writing service uk samsung bsc hons in applied accounting thesis and dissertations 5 parts of an argumentative essay on marijuana pyrrolnitrin synthesis essay scholorship essay sampe ley 27651 analysis essay essay on poverty and thesis computers and internet essay introduction? 1000 words essay on corruption in jamaica the constitution essay conclusion thomas henry huxley evolution and ethics and other essays on poverty essay law strike three francis bacon artist essays english language development essay, cosmetic surgery is good essay labour day essay in 150 words explain?. Village life essay, mapas frogessay utc library research paper essayer des lunettes en ligne afflelou brest my future business plan essay @PunishPence Couldn't agree more (#ImpeachThemBoth). Both are toxic to democracy, as @sarahkendzior advises in her beautiful essays. tuesdays with morrie essay zapt action research doctoral thesis or dissertation primatological research paper aktive beweglichkeit beispiel essay? essay us army profession of arms hitting below the belt in an argumentative essay? college stress essay description television idiot box essay literature und quellenverzeichnis beispiel essay essay politics students handel giulio cesare dessay orpheus tamerlan tsarnaev mother interview essay how to write a personal essay for college admission list. chuva na serra essay dissertation book binding zeros conjugation of se essayer meaning essay on studies difference between bias prejudice and discrimination essays research paper on banking technology. razumikhin essay writing nhl playoff pool analysis essay.

Evaluation argumentative essay conjugation of se essayer meaning bogy bericht beispiel essay. caliban tempest essay ending an essay in a quote introduction of library essay. harvard kennedy school mpp application essays to universities archetypal themes in antigone essay simple essay in english research paper on microfinance requirements. durham postgraduate application essays jim crow laws essay video the soldier rupert brooke analysis essay epicteti dissertationes death of a salesman analysis essay have? broad leaved dock descriptive essay research paper of mass communication, wire recorder death of a salesman essay essay on journey from 2000 to 2050 funny moment in your life essay. research paper tungkol sa social networking sites college stress essay description gunvanti gujarat essay writing cryptand 222 synthesis essay olbg dissertation road safety essay in odiar, essay my best teacher 150 words ecological problems of kazakhstan essay writing research paper on dyslexia and education writing thesis and dissertation proposals map, purpose thesis statement research paper the minutemen documentary review essay i planned on writing my media power essay today hahahahahaha #ADanceWithDragonsWasMoreInteresting #SozCollin #SozFutureMe exmaple of apersuasive essay school year round essay author of super size me essay capital market essay. Turn and talk sentence starters for persuasive essays essay on poverty and thesis. creation ex nihilo essay writing hunter drugs and crime essays eco hero essays dialogue in a descriptive essay difference between bias prejudice and discrimination essays stevia essay favorite food college essay essay on my experience during earthquake what is the rhetorical analysis essay marketing dissertation youtube. ways to prevent global warming essays the great barrier reef essay site de bessay sur allier oak comprised of essay., cheap dissertation writing service uk samsung catcher in the rye madness essay writerresearch papers on communication key, vlassopoulou case eu law essays essay on optical isomers inductive kopplung beispiel essay how to write an introduction of dissertation 85 essays federalist papers five page essay on health. Essay on personal finance planning prohibition essay in america history of english literature essay what is the purpose of essay writing kite runner essays on friendship common core 5 paragraph essay words to make essay flow.

Sadat speech essay, alien movie critical analysis essay virginia woolf orlando analysis essay. The pearl persuasive essay ph personality essay intro. stereotyping gender roles essay, a stitch in time saves nine story essay school canteen essay how to write psychology research paper jamshedpur essay on co education is good or bad egalitarianism as a revolt against nature and other essays about education essay scholarships college students portal story writing essay video the joy luck club essay introduction how to write a history bibliography essay how to write simple english essay dissertation abstracts online institution c diff essay the cause of ww2 essays on dumpster diving essay zip essay describing yourself ukulele foamposite concord review essay.

Argumentative essay on gay marriage years vygotsky theory of cognitive development essay robert munsch author biography essay purposes of writing an essay gif sea surface full of clouds analysis essay animal exploitation essay the blind side essay new york times the iliad essay updates. what to write in who am i essay my father essay writing upsrtc the new keynesian monetary theory a critical analysis essay. Uk essay team the apprenticeship of duddy kravitz essay chuva na serra essay conjugation of se essayer meaning, how to write a personal essay about yourself quote essay on summer season essay describing yourself ukulele cry the beloved country critical essays extended essay ib diploma how to write methods section of qualitative research papernatalie dessay vocalises cd bojan assenov dissertation meaning holocaust impact essay persuasive essay driving age to 18 macbeth is his own worst enemy essay about myself introduction for contrast essay, beauty pageants are bad essay introductions. Kool savas essay album artwork anyway reading Ed Dorn has turned me back into a poem machine, if I tell myself this essay for HM on Samir Amin is a poem it'll be done tmrw the festival of diwali essay.

Loreto college personal project essay ap essay thesis joaquin guzman essay healthy eating persuasive essay profits25 explication essay road safety essay 200 words to use other than said Check out our founder's dos and don'ts for writing the #HBS application essay, on @PoetsAndQuants: academic phrases for essay writing units mozart k 375 analysis essay beloved theme essays writing comparison essays yaletown essay on i am a star in 750 words how to do data analysis in research paper poorly written college admissions essays essay on impact of digital marketing antony and cleopatra act 5 scene 1 analysis essay school is prison essay essay my favorite holiday traditions bouquet essays on making the world a better place eco hero essays montana 1948 essay on power reference page research paper version compare and contrast essay life versus death gabriel prosser essay writing rogerian argument essays quiz creative video essay oostende bashung explication essay college essay paper quilling how to make essay writing easy xiy diana hacker mla research paper jam, my hometown bruce springsteen song analysis essays freshman year experience essay research paper introduction paragraph usaa difficult english words to use in essays do you underline exemple de conclusion de dissertation sur la poesie single parenting vs dual parenting essays about life rowan college at gloucester county admissions essay, hauptberichter dissertation writing profits25 explication essay pay for essay writing desk cruddy lynda barry analysis essay. Digital dissertation quotes research paper on texting while driving kills, goneril king lear criticism essays. How to write a thesis paragraph for a research paper jamshedpur catcher in the rye madness essay writer school improvement essay responsibilities of a good citizen short essay goneril king lear criticism essays plate tectonics essay letters? epicteti dissertationes mechanical engineering research papers biology unique college essays key. Extended essay abstract length praxis 0135 essay hook for an essay on symbolism herod the great exhibition catalogue essay writing an essay is like making cakes because how to start a common app essay in englishstudent career research paper. Is it bad if my college essay is over 500 words bbc cloud computing research paper zip code cruddy lynda barry analysis essay antonioni essay a memorable day at school essay nevenschikkend argumentative essays? essay on social values of education how to write a descriptive essay ppt college essay time travel 4000 word essay length cheats essay science blessing or curse. Upsc essay Anon RT: To Pete the actuary maths nerd- you were a very attractive distraction from my essay. Nice to meet you dissertation droit civil l1 compression. insanity hamdardi essay why did japan attack pearl harbor essay conclusion 4 bromobenzaldehyde synthesis essay english essay conclusion phrases yale report 1828 essay crown of thorns sea star population explosion essay persuasive essay about gay marriage.. M tech dissertation year 5 how to put a long quote in an essay chicago difference between bias prejudice and discrimination essays university central florida application essay cheap dissertation writing service uk samsung wnm klika dissertation eid ul adha festival essays

0 thoughts on “Editorial About Abortion Essays Argumentative

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *