Sin City Film Analysis Essay

Of all the comic-book adaptations that have ever been mounted, from Flash Gordon in 1936 to The Fantastic Four in 2005, this is liable to score highest in the ‘fan satisfaction’ category. No niggling here along the lines of “Spider-Man shouldn’t have organic web-shooters” or “Batman’s parents shouldn’t be shot by the Joker”. This collaboration between two one-man bands, comic-book writer-artist Frank Miller and director-writer-editor-cinematographer-producer Robert Rodriguez, is as faithful to the source material as those cheapo ’60s Marvel cartoons that panned over panels from the comics while voice-over artists read out the word balloons. Like most successful comics, Sin City created a recognisable concrete-but-unreal world. Miller mixed a stew of thugs in trenchcoats out of Chandler or Spillane, a spice of the ‘bad girl art’ that made paperback covers of the 1950s stand out from newsracks and a splash of the manga-ish stylised goriness which inspired movies buffs like Quentin Tarantino (who guest-directs one scene) have only recently discovered. The film exactly matches the look of the comic: stark black-and-white images, with the occasional shocking or beautiful splash of rich colour. Most modern noirs incline to the blacker side of monochrome, but Miller’s scratchboard techniques, adapted superbly by Rodriguez, often get the most impact out of white – the blank round reflections of a killer’s sunglasses, crosses of sticking-plaster on a much-wounded face, arterial gushes of milky blood.

The movie script also matches the original stories virtually word for word. The original mini-series was about Marv (perfectly incarnated here by comeback kid Mickey Rourke) an unstoppable but soft-hearted freak who avenges the murder of his sweetie-for-a-night by taking on a ghastly cannibal (a blank-faced, wordless, far-from-Frodo Elijah Wood). The film adapts this (later retitled The Hard Goodbye) and two of its follow-ups, The Big Fat Kill and That Yellow Bastard, seemingly unconcerned about the similarities between the plots and characters, confident that the seductive images and picturesque people will hold the interest. Lifting structure from Pulp Fiction, which is hardly in a position to complain if it’s imitated, Sin City has top-and-tail scenes that frame the three episodes, which are told out of order.

Be warned, though – this is a working definition of a boys’ film. Men are either wounded, sensitive mass murderers (good guys) or repulsive, sadistic mass murderers (bad guys). Women are either improbably beautiful whores (good girls) or improbably beautiful pole-dancers (very good girls). Any exceptions, like Carla Gugino as a male-fantasy lesbian, tend to get killed off – nastily.

The extreme stylisation takes the sting out of the pandering, though, in that the hallucinatory female characters tend to be exploiting male desire while living their own lives removed from others’ ideas about them. Arguably, the male characters are even more of an insult to the sex; Rodriguez and Miller’s once-in-a-lifetime cast of bruised, near-unrecognisable faces bring to life an array of tarnished heroes, each tougher than Mike Hammer on steroids, and appalling villains who’d be too deformed and demented even for Gotham City’s Arkham Asylum.

Rodriguez'’s best film by far and a treat for fans of sinful black-and-white noir with a violent twist.

A fake film noir seemingly designed for people who never have and never will see a real one, “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For” seeks to pay homage to the graphic novel format by re-imagining Frank Miller‘s tome as a feature film; unfortunately, the big screen and the 3D merely call attention to the aspects of the printed page that either don’t work or don’t translate easily from one medium to another.

First of all, there’s the narration — so, so much narration, with so many deafening inner monologues laid over so many scenes of people drinking, driving, grimacing or stripping without taking their bras off. (The latter is the sole domain of Jessica Alba‘s Nancy, but more on her in a moment.)

See video:Eva Green Is a Seductive ‘Dame to Kill For’ in Racy Red Band ‘Sin City’ Trailer (Video)

Add to that a ridiculously thick layer of sexism, with every woman in the film portrayed as a prostitute, stripper or man-trap. There’s a policeman’s wife who dares to be over the age of 40, and is thus cheated upon at the earliest moment, and a vengeance-driven dancer who — even though she’s a crack shot — has to mutilate herself to get a man to help her carry out her vendetta. Heaven forbid she have her own agency in a story like this, one that teeters on self-parody but lacks the sense of humor required to take the plunge.

As with its predecessor of nine (!) years ago, this second “Sin City” sees directors Miller and Robert Rodriguez shooting their actors on green-screen and surrounding them with animation and hyper-stylized lighting and art direction to make the movie look as much like a comic book as possible. It’s a clever gimmick for about 10 minutes, but then you start noticing how the actors have been directed not to move their faces much, so that they’ll look more characters on a page.

The blank expressions (and that crushing narration) merely underscore the fact that lines like “She didn’t deserve a second thought — and I couldn’t get her out of my mind,” work much better on the page than they do spoken out loud.

If the three stories in “A Dame to Kill For” meshed well in Miller’s original book, they merely brush shoulders awkwardly on film. Gambler Johnny (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) bests corrupt politician Rourke (Powers Boothe) at the poker table but comes to regret it. Rourke becomes a target for Nancy, because the senator killed her lover (Bruce Willis, who appears periodically as a passive-aggressive ghost). And private eye Dwight (Josh Brolin) finds himself ensnared by the wiles of his ex Ava (Eva Green), a literal femme fatale with a rich husband and a wicked soul.

Also read:Joseph Gordon-Levitt Is Star of ‘Sin City’ and Male Feminist: ‘It Benefits Society as a Whole’

Green is the only female performer who sees through this movie’s ludicrousness and dares to one-up it. Her nudity feels defiant — she and even Brolin show a lot more skin than any of the strippers — and she turns Ava’s rapaciousness into one of the few tangible objects in this movie made up principally of special effects. (Mickey Rourke, once again, brings soulfulness to the role of Marv, a monstrous tough-guy with a heart of tin.)

This is Rodriguez’s second sequel in a row, following last year’s “Machete Kills,” in which he turns sex, violence and general exploitation into an occasion for dullness. All either movie had to be was entertaining, but neither accomplishes that task; for a film loaded with decapitations and gun-toting ladies in bondage gear, “Sin City” gets really tedious really quickly.

Also read:‘Sin City 2’ Ad Rejected by ABC Because Eva Green’s Too Sexy

(And on a side note: Is anyone else skeeved out by the fact that Rodriguez once cast 13-year-old Alexa PenaVega as a smart and spunky Spy Kid but now gives the 26-year-old actress roles as strippers and whores?)

Both Rodriguez and Miller have excelled in taking old genre tropes and making them slick and exciting for new audiences. “Sin City: A Dame to Kill For” brings the slickness, so much so that everything else just slides off of it.

0 thoughts on “Sin City Film Analysis Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *